Pages

Sunday, October 16, 2011

"Re-frame"

Matthew 22: 15-22
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Ordinary Time – CROP and Bread for the World Sunday
First United Church – Sermon by Rev. Caela Simmons Wood

Have you ever been hungry? I actually haven’t, but I know some of you have.

Of course, I say I’m hungry all the time. As in, “Oh, look. It’s 3:00 and I haven’t had a snack this afternoon. Must be time for a muffin and some coffee.” Or, “I’m going to run in and get a granola bar while we get gas. I’m famished!”

This isn’t really hunger, though, right? I mean, it’s sort of the white people problems version of hunger. “White people problems” in case you’ve missed that term on the internet is a catch-all phrase for all of those little annoyances that we folks with privilege like to gripe about as if they were real problems.

So when I feel cranky because I want to get some lunch but I have to drive out of the way to get to a drive through because my son is asleep in the back seat – that’s not hunger, really. That’s just the white people problems version of hunger.

I read a book this week that talked about real hunger.

The True Story of Hansel and Gretel is a novel by Louise Murphy. Part fairy-tale, part historical fiction, and all horrific, it is the tale of an eleven year old Jewish girl and her seven year old brother – abandoned deep in a Polish forest at the height of the Holocaust so they will not be killed. Their Stepmother renames them Hansel and Gretel as she and their father drive away. In the forest, they stumble upon the house of Magda, a midwife shunned by the local village because she is believed to be a witch. Magda takes them in and protects them as the world collapses around them.

Hansel and Gretel know what it’s like to be truly hungry. Gretel watches her brother gather saliva in his mouth – she has taught him how to hold it there for about a hour and then swallow it bit by bit, slowly, pretending it’s a delicious soup. Hansel, just seven years old, knows that he can ball his fist up tightly in his stomach when he’s trying to go to sleep – just a little way to cut the stabbing hunger pains. Both children know there are rules to eating – that each child can do whatever they wish with their piece of daily bread. They may choose to eat it all at once, save it for later, or share it, but the choice is always theirs alone.

Real hunger. The kind that children and adults all over the world still live with each and every day.

On this Sunday, we participate in the CROP Walk, raising money for Church World Service to send aid to hungry people both in the U.S. and abroad. We also join with churches across the nation in celebrating Bread for the World Sunday.

Many churches will participate today in an offering of letters as a part of Bread for the World Sunday. This non-profit, faith-based organization is a treasure trove of information on hunger advocacy both here and in other nations. Each year, they create detailed packets of information that churches can use as members write handwritten letters to their representatives in the federal government, hoping to impact legislation in a way that will result in fewer hungry people in God’s creation.

Speaking of Bread for the World, I got an email from them this past week informing me that two Indiana politicians, Senator Lugar and Representative Stutzman, are introducing a piece of legislation that would dramatically cut assistance to families who receive aid from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – better known as “food stamps.” They sit on the Senate and House Agricultural Committees and the USDA is actually in charge of the federal food stamp program. So if anyone ever tells you that agricultural policy doesn’t matter, just remember that the USDA controls a program that feeds 45 million Americans – half of whom are children.

In partnering with these two organizations, we, as a community of faith, are attacking hunger on two fronts – Church World Service provides direct assistance to people who are hungry and Bread for the World impacts policymakers, seeking to stop hunger at its source.

Of course, one of the ways we, as a society stop hunger at its sources is through our government’s policies. Within the federal budget, dollars are constantly being allocated and reallocated to assist hungry people and increase access to food. When you and I pay taxes, some our dollars help people who are hungry. When we go to the polls each time there’s an election, our choices affect the lives of those who live with a constant gnawing pain in their stomachs.

Jesus had a few things to say about paying taxes in today’s lectionary passage from Matthew. Doubtless, you’ve heard the phrase, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s…” a few times in your life. Traditionally, this phrase has been used when people want to have some biblical proof that there is a Christian world and a secular world. We have said there are Christian values, yes, and those are important, but there are also secular values and it’s okay to be a part of that world, too.

For generations, people have understood this story to mean that, when in Rome, it’s okay to do as the Romans do.

Yes, we are called to be people of faith, but we are also allowed to do what our governments ask. Even within the Society of Friends, which has a strong tradition of pacifism, there have been voices that, for centuries, have called upon this biblical phrase to argue that tax resistance – that practice of withholding taxes that might be used for military defense – is not expected of Christians.[1]

Well, I hate to break this to you, but I think that interpretation is pretty much wishful thinking.

When we take the time to really dig in and look at this story, including its context, what we come away with is much more nebulous. It’s hard to conclude what Jesus really thought about the question posed to him about paying taxes…but it is easy to learn a few other things.

Jesus is in Jerusalem and is approached by an odd group of folks. American Baptist Minister Paul Simpson Duke calls this pairing of the Pharisees disciples and Herodians a “bipartisan group.” These are not two groups that would have spent time together, but they are willing to “reach across the aisle” to entrap Jesus.[2]

The group lays into Jesus with flattery and then dishes out their actual question, “So, is it okay with God if we pay taxes to the Emperor of Rome?” I don’t think, for a minute, that these folks really cared too much about Jesus’ answer. They weren’t planning on altering their 1040s based on his response. Instead, as in the Matthew passage we read a few weeks ago on the question of Jesus’ authority, their sole motivation is to embarrass Jesus, and perhaps even find grounds for arresting him.

Jesus is in a bind. Aren’t you glad you’re not Jesus? If he says “yes, pay your taxes” then he frustrates and alienates devout Jews who were chafing at Rome’s occupation. If he says “no, don’t pay them,” he risks immediate arrest for treason.

Recognizing that he cannot answer truthfully, one way or another, Jesus sidesteps the question and offers a more powerful response that is more far-reaching in scope. First, he disarms his opponents by shaming them publicly. He asks them for a denarius – a Roman coin that was a large sum of money. Most of the onlookers standing around would not have access to this kind of cash and Jesus didn’t either.

They produce it quickly, revealing themselves to be members of the wealthy elite. If this were the Occupy movement, Jesus would be handing them a sticker to wear that says, “We are the 1%.”

Jesus asks them who is on the coin. They answer, “Caesar.” And he says, “That’s right. So give Caesar what belongs to Caesar and give God what belongs to God.”

On one level, it seems simple. If Caesar is asking for taxes, payable only in Roman coin and Jesus says to give those coins back to Caesar, then, yes, you should pay your taxes.

But, it’s the second part of Jesus’ answer that really messes things up. Sometimes I wish he would just stop, but he always keeps on going. Notice how the second part is the stuff that rarely gets quoted? We usually just say, “Render unto Caesar – dot, dot, dot.” But it’s that last part, “Render unto God what is God’s” that complicates things. Because Jesus, like any other religious Jew would have believed that fully everything in creation, including those coins bearing Caesar’s image, belonged to God.

So it’s hard to know what he meant, but if I were pressed to interpret, I think I’d stake my money on saying he meant one of two things: 1) no, don’t pay your taxes. That money really belongs to God and should be used for God’s work, or, 2) I’m not even going to answer your question because I think it’s a bad question and it’s not worth my time.

This passage is not about whether or not you should pay your taxes. It’s about a way bigger question than that.

It’s about who we choose to follow during our time on this earth – do we blindly follow the people who are in power? The Pharisees and Herodians of our day? It’s about figuring out where our allegiances lie. It’s about remembering that everything in creation – all of it – ultimately belongs to God. Not to Caesar. Not to the person holding the coin. It belongs to God.

Jesus re-frames the conversation. Backed up against the wall, Jesus refuses to allow his opponents to control the direction of dialogue. He asserts himself and brings the attention back to where it belongs – to God and to our response to living as faithful children of the Most High.

It makes me wonder – what would happen if Christians re-framed the conversation in 2011?




What if, the next time we got in a debate with someone about tax law, the debt ceiling, the cost of the wars, the allocation of funds to people in need – what if the next time that happened, we didn’t just start talking about statistics and realities? What if, instead, we started talking about the Realm of God?

What if we talked about our call to be stewards of the great resources given to us? What if, when forced as a nation to make difficult decisions about where to allocate our dollars, we Christians reminded everyone that all of this – all the dollars, all the food, all of it – belongs to God?

What if we kept talking about our call to be stewards of creation? What if we reminded those around us that God created everything and called it good? What if we reminded others that we are called to care for creation and tend it carefully, with great love and respect? What if we moved people toward a vision of a place where no child goes hungry because we’ve figured out how to share after all these millennia of turmoil?

I’ll be the first to admit, it’s hard for me to imagine. But when I see Jesus in action there in the Jerusalem Temple; when I watch our fearless leader go toe-to-toe with the oppressive powers of his day; when I hear his gentle, yet firm, voice say that we are to give back to God what is God’s – I can imagine us re-framing the conversation here and now and for many years to come.




[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Render_unto_Caesar...#Justification_for_obeying_authority.2C_paying_taxes
[2] http://www.goodpreacher.com/journalread.php?id=2299

No comments: